Crypto Ponzi OneCoin May Have Used Flood Of Fake Reviews To Boost Ailing Image

The OneCoin cryptocurrency venture - accused by government of being a Ponzi scheme - tried to spice up its fortunes by utilizing "spurious" accounts to put favorable evaluations on TrustPilot and Quora, in line with new analysis.

The Digital Forensic Research Lab (DFRLab), an entity below U.S. think-tank the AtlanticCouncil, explicit in a report on its weblog Wednesday that OneCoin launched the "astroturfing campaign" crosswise the identical time that its founder, Ruja Ignatova, disappeared following quite couple of authorized instances towards her and different members of the venture in 2019.

  CRYPTOCURRENCIES GRAPH

In March of final yr, U.S. prosecutors in New York inactive a individual they explicit was a "top leader" of OneCoin, locution the venture stole "billions" from buyers by way of its alleged Pyramids of Egypt scheme. At the identical time as Konstantin Ignatov was apprehended, Ignatova was in addition charged with wire fraud, securities fraud and cash laundering.

CRYPTO ROBINHOOD

Mark Scott, the attorney behind the scheme was in addition discovered responsible of laundering $400 million for OneCoin in New York in November. At crosswise the identical time, quite couple of nations introduced they had been taking motion to guard buyers towards the venture, which used Pyramids of Egypt promoting scheme techniques to lure new buyers.

DFRLab's researchers discovered that, in October of final yr, OneCoin obtained a slew of five-star evaluations on shopper rankings cyberspace site TrustPilot.

"Of the 579 reviews for OneCoin on the site, 90 pct were positive. Of the five star ratings, about 400 were promulgated inside the span of a single month," the publish states.

The researchers say that quite couple of one-star evaluations had been "buried" by Noah's flood of constructive evaluations.

While the lab's me could not inform if the evaluations got here from machine-controlled or "spurious" accounts as a result of limits of the TrustPilot consumer interface, the spike in five-star score "indicated an abnormal inflow of favorable reviews even as OneCoin's PR and legal woes mounted."

An evaluation of reviewers on question-answering cyberspace site Quora, nevertheless, discovered visibilitys posting positively about OneCoin that confirmed "signs of spurious behavior." These encircled an epilepsia minor epilepsy of visibility photos and bios, erratic posting occasions, and "an exclusive interest in OneCoin-related discussions."

Numerous visibilitys presupposed to be subject-matter consultants on cryptocurrency, in line with the report, even so restricted solutions to the "viability or value" of OneCoin. DFRLab explicit it was not in a position to verify the identities of the people, with social media searches displaying "no similar or matching results."

"While there was no direct evidence ligature these spurious visibilitys and reviews to OneCoin employees or evidence of machine-controlled activity on either platform, the visibilitys and favorable reviews even so served to boost trust for the OneCoin brand as it long-faced a multibillion-dollar scandal," the report concludes.

Disclosure Read More

The chief in blockchain information, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the best print media requirements and abides by a strict set of editorial insurance policies. CoinDesk is an impartial working subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.


Crypto Ponzi OneCoin May Have Used Flood Of Fake Reviews To Boost Ailing Image
Crypto Ponzi OneCoin May Have Used Flood Of Fake Reviews To Boost Ailing Image

Post a Comment

0 Comments